Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1626

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:12, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1626_pons_thalamus_amygdala_carcinosarcoma_diencephalon_Neural_medulla



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:22359292..22359301,+p9@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359398..22359428,+p5@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359432..22359478,+p4@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359501..22359513,+p7@SLC17A6
Hg19::chr11:22359910..22359937,+p1@SLC17A6


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neuronal stem cell2.63e-148
neuron4.17e-106
neuroblast4.17e-106
electrically signaling cell4.17e-106
neural cell5.75e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.18e-8682
neural tube1.25e-8057
neural rod1.25e-8057
future spinal cord1.25e-8057
neural keel1.25e-8057
regional part of nervous system9.65e-7694
nervous system9.65e-7694
regional part of brain7.43e-6759
regional part of forebrain6.03e-6441
forebrain6.03e-6441
future forebrain6.03e-6441
brain2.74e-6369
future brain2.74e-6369
anterior neural tube3.28e-6242
neural plate9.88e-5786
presumptive neural plate9.88e-5786
neurectoderm1.28e-5390
regional part of cerebral cortex9.97e-5322
gray matter3.68e-4934
brain grey matter3.68e-4934
neocortex1.07e-4820
telencephalon1.29e-4834
cerebral hemisphere2.85e-4832
regional part of telencephalon1.78e-4633
cerebral cortex7.94e-4625
pallium7.94e-4625
pre-chordal neural plate1.83e-4261
ectoderm-derived structure4.52e-42169
ectoderm9.71e-41173
presumptive ectoderm9.71e-41173
adult organism7.19e-34115
head1.61e-33123
anterior region of body2.29e-31129
craniocervical region2.29e-31129
temporal lobe1.88e-197
posterior neural tube1.24e-1815
chordal neural plate1.24e-1815
diencephalon5.75e-177
future diencephalon5.75e-177
tube6.74e-15194
gyrus7.50e-156
occipital lobe6.95e-135
parietal lobe7.67e-135
segmental subdivision of hindbrain7.75e-1312
hindbrain7.75e-1312
presumptive hindbrain7.75e-1312
limbic system2.18e-125
brainstem4.34e-128
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.01e-1113
anatomical conduit2.26e-10241
gland of diencephalon4.44e-104
neuroendocrine gland4.44e-104
epithelium2.00e-09309
cell layer3.26e-09312
pons4.11e-093
medulla oblongata5.06e-093
myelencephalon5.06e-093
future myelencephalon5.06e-093
middle temporal gyrus2.75e-083
spinal cord5.06e-083
anatomical cluster1.50e-07286
organism subdivision1.63e-07365
regional part of metencephalon6.83e-079
metencephalon6.83e-079
future metencephalon6.83e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
HDAC2#3066410.7324961893010.0001450965797478750.00188526271364621
REST#597847.720022972902420.0005286363773650570.00457076369034103
SIN3A#2594244.327107781452110.004977052855762880.0232353682536775
ZNF143#7702410.80070124178230.0001415223430863190.00184386876117665



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.