Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1511

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:00, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:41738169..41738207,-p1@Armc2
Mm9::chr15:79489626..79489697,+p1@Cby1
Mm9::chr15:79604838..79604904,-p1@Dnalc4
Mm9::chr19:5107027..5107038,-p2@Rab1b
Mm9::chr1:88479075..88479140,-p1@Pde6d


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.61e-2973
nervous system5.20e-2975
neurectoderm2.16e-2664
neural plate2.16e-2664
presumptive neural plate2.16e-2664
ectoderm-derived structure3.51e-2595
ectoderm3.51e-2595
presumptive ectoderm3.51e-2595
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.58e-2492
neural tube1.99e-2452
neural rod1.99e-2452
future spinal cord1.99e-2452
neural keel1.99e-2452
regional part of nervous system3.99e-2454
ecto-epithelium2.94e-2273
brain1.76e-2147
future brain1.76e-2147
regional part of brain4.87e-2146
pre-chordal neural plate1.70e-2049
anterior neural tube1.20e-1840
regional part of forebrain2.19e-1839
forebrain2.19e-1839
future forebrain2.19e-1839
gray matter3.05e-1834
brain grey matter1.87e-1529
regional part of telencephalon1.87e-1529
telencephalon1.87e-1529
cerebral cortex3.66e-1121
cerebral hemisphere3.66e-1121
pallium3.66e-1121
regional part of cerebral cortex4.78e-0917
tube1.08e-08114
anatomical conduit3.50e-08122


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}