Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4596

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:31, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4596_non_CD4_acute_Natural_Peripheral_CD8_blood



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:36515033..36515051,-p5@STK38
Hg19::chr6:36515067..36515090,-p3@STK38
Hg19::chr6:36515092..36515172,-p2@STK38


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic stem cell4.55e-27172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.55e-27172
hematopoietic cell1.32e-26182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.27e-24165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.27e-24165
leukocyte1.15e-23140
nongranular leukocyte6.89e-22119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.96e-18124
classical monocyte3.64e-1745
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.49e-1642
mature alpha-beta T cell1.29e-1218
alpha-beta T cell1.29e-1218
immature T cell1.29e-1218
mature T cell1.29e-1218
immature alpha-beta T cell1.29e-1218
myeloid cell2.51e-12112
common myeloid progenitor2.51e-12112
myeloid leukocyte2.81e-1276
lymphocyte4.00e-1253
common lymphoid progenitor4.00e-1253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.50e-1252
T cell5.12e-1125
pro-T cell5.12e-1125
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.21e-0971
monopoietic cell6.14e-0963
monocyte6.14e-0963
monoblast6.14e-0963
promonocyte6.14e-0963
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell2.06e-0811
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.19e-0870
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.12e-0865
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system8.48e-13102
blood island8.48e-13102
hemolymphoid system1.02e-12112
blood2.83e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid2.83e-0815
organism substance2.83e-0815


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190994511484716
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115709142975072
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.02811123808506
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327413705094792
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00438737204194806
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0324064924800727
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0464660406618901
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0109117498383839
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0128661141449414
MXI1#460139.96157162875930.001011470541259020.00722897227527209
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0270736796128402
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.0047326484603146
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173616366634751
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00885424729870856
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.027810622419699
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00203913749734525
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109392885635106



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.