Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1336

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:51, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1336_CD8_Natural_Pericytes_Peripheral_medulla_thyroid_ductus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:2320600..2320611,+p@chr11:2320600..2320611
+
Hg19::chr11:2320635..2320646,+p@chr11:2320635..2320646
+
Hg19::chr11:3028258..3028281,-p4@CARS
Hg19::chr13:114920170..114920193,+p@chr13:114920170..114920193
+
Hg19::chr2:217557659..217557673,-p@chr2:217557659..217557673
-
Hg19::chr6:128299556..128299563,+p@chr6:128299556..128299563
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.74e-33115
neural tube6.90e-1257
neural rod6.90e-1257
future spinal cord6.90e-1257
neural keel6.90e-1257
blood1.60e-1015
haemolymphatic fluid1.60e-1015
organism substance1.60e-1015
neural plate4.17e-1086
presumptive neural plate4.17e-1086
neurectoderm6.01e-1090
regional part of nervous system3.26e-0994
nervous system3.26e-0994
central nervous system8.29e-0982
regional part of brain1.29e-0859
regional part of forebrain2.07e-0841
forebrain2.07e-0841
future forebrain2.07e-0841
anterior neural tube4.64e-0842
brain9.28e-0869
future brain9.28e-0869
telencephalic nucleus1.53e-077
telencephalon2.37e-0734
nucleus of brain3.54e-079
neural nucleus3.54e-079
regional part of telencephalon5.95e-0733
basal ganglion6.91e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis6.91e-079
aggregate regional part of brain6.91e-079
collection of basal ganglia6.91e-079
cerebral subcortex6.91e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.