Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C641

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:22, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C641_CD14_Neutrophils_Peripheral_Basophils_Whole_Monocytederived_Eosinophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:106009594..106009596,+p@chr10:106009594..106009596
+
Hg19::chr11:6061520..6061539,+p@chr11:6061520..6061539
+
Hg19::chr17:4641746..4641758,-p@chr17:4641746..4641758
-
Hg19::chr17:57870810..57870824,+p@chr17:57870810..57870824
+
Hg19::chr19:52264235..52264246,+p6@FPR2
Hg19::chr1:153347033..153347045,-p3@S100A12
Hg19::chr21:39627657..39627671,+p@chr21:39627657..39627671
+
Hg19::chr21:39627673..39627684,+p@chr21:39627673..39627684
+
Hg19::chr2:132275749..132275752,+p@chr2:132275749..132275752
+
Hg19::chr3:194131791..194131795,-p@chr3:194131791..194131795
-
Hg19::chr6:31238972..31238985,-p12@HLA-C
Hg19::chr6:41196052..41196063,+p3@TREML4
Hg19::chr6:41196079..41196088,+p2@TREML4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0050832defense response to fungus0.0259961596961002
GO:0009620response to fungus0.0259961596961002
GO:0005626insoluble fraction0.0259961596961002
GO:0006805xenobiotic metabolic process0.0259961596961002
GO:0032393MHC class I receptor activity0.0259961596961002
GO:0009410response to xenobiotic stimulus0.0259961596961002
GO:0042742defense response to bacterium0.048525083909223
GO:0002474antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I0.048525083909223
GO:0048002antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen0.048525083909223
GO:0009617response to bacterium0.048525083909223



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.37e-12542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.37e-12542
defensive cell2.97e-10948
phagocyte2.97e-10948
monopoietic cell2.26e-8659
monocyte2.26e-8659
monoblast2.26e-8659
promonocyte2.26e-8659
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.03e-8361
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.33e-7766
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.34e-7567
myeloid leukocyte3.43e-7572
stuff accumulating cell6.04e-5887
myeloid cell1.32e-48108
common myeloid progenitor1.32e-48108
nongranular leukocyte3.39e-45115
leukocyte2.91e-40136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.61e-40120
hematopoietic stem cell1.32e-31168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.32e-31168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.23e-31161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.23e-31161
hematopoietic cell9.95e-30177
mesenchymal cell4.40e-12354
connective tissue cell9.75e-12361
motile cell1.62e-10386
multi fate stem cell5.07e-09427
somatic stem cell8.16e-09433
stem cell1.51e-08441
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow3.74e-6676
bone element5.43e-6182
skeletal element3.63e-5590
hematopoietic system7.09e-5498
blood island7.09e-5498
immune system3.09e-5393
skeletal system3.52e-49100
hemolymphoid system1.92e-48108
musculoskeletal system2.03e-27167
lateral plate mesoderm2.42e-23203
mesoderm3.16e-14315
mesoderm-derived structure3.16e-14315
presumptive mesoderm3.16e-14315
connective tissue2.89e-11371
dura mater4.90e-071
future meninx4.90e-071
ectomeninx4.90e-071
future dura mater4.90e-071


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.