Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4790

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:57, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4790_CD14_ductus_CD14CD16_blood_lung_Whole_thymus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:115653061..115653073,-p4@SLC46A2
Hg19::chr9:115653119..115653132,-p3@SLC46A2
Hg19::chr9:115653148..115653163,-p1@SLC46A2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte3.96e-5942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.96e-5942
monopoietic cell1.61e-5859
monocyte1.61e-5859
monoblast1.61e-5859
promonocyte1.61e-5859
defensive cell3.43e-5648
phagocyte3.43e-5648
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.49e-5661
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.84e-5166
myeloid leukocyte1.73e-5072
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell5.23e-5067
nongranular leukocyte1.75e-34115
leukocyte1.06e-29136
myeloid cell3.38e-29108
common myeloid progenitor3.38e-29108
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.38e-27120
stuff accumulating cell3.33e-2787
hematopoietic stem cell3.21e-21168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.21e-21168
intermediate monocyte4.54e-209
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.54e-209
hematopoietic cell2.11e-19177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.23e-19161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.23e-19161
non-classical monocyte3.95e-083
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte3.95e-083
single nucleate cell1.15e-073
mononuclear cell1.15e-073
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.03e-6498
blood island3.03e-6498
hemolymphoid system5.90e-61108
immune system1.83e-4393
bone marrow1.45e-4276
bone element1.66e-3882
skeletal element6.09e-3490
skeletal system2.87e-29100
lateral plate mesoderm5.22e-28203
blood1.73e-1915
haemolymphatic fluid1.73e-1915
organism substance1.73e-1915
mesoderm3.15e-19315
mesoderm-derived structure3.15e-19315
presumptive mesoderm3.15e-19315
musculoskeletal system3.08e-14167
adult organism7.86e-14114
embryonic structure2.27e-08564
germ layer4.61e-08560
germ layer / neural crest4.61e-08560
embryonic tissue4.61e-08560
presumptive structure4.61e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure4.61e-08560
epiblast (generic)4.61e-08560
developing anatomical structure5.52e-08581
male genital duct1.20e-073
internal male genitalia1.20e-073
embryo1.91e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0281626105349393
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0328106657017798
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.000679757614123224
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00423419518781865



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.