Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4820

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:21, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4820_cerebellum_parietal_occipital_pineal_duodenum_pituitary_temporal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr9:3525867..3525902,-p3@RFX3
Hg19::chr9:3525910..3525955,-p4@RFX3
Hg19::chr9:3525968..3526016,-p1@RFX3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.02e-33115
neural tube8.28e-2957
neural rod8.28e-2957
future spinal cord8.28e-2957
neural keel8.28e-2957
central nervous system1.29e-2882
regional part of nervous system1.49e-2694
nervous system1.49e-2694
anterior neural tube8.62e-2542
brain1.27e-2469
future brain1.27e-2469
regional part of forebrain1.70e-2441
forebrain1.70e-2441
future forebrain1.70e-2441
regional part of brain8.09e-2459
gray matter7.31e-2134
brain grey matter7.31e-2134
telencephalon1.83e-2034
regional part of telencephalon5.20e-2033
cerebral hemisphere1.15e-1932
neurectoderm2.52e-1890
neural plate6.80e-1886
presumptive neural plate6.80e-1886
cerebral cortex1.16e-1525
pallium1.16e-1525
pre-chordal neural plate3.69e-1561
regional part of cerebral cortex1.18e-1422
neocortex1.95e-1320
anterior region of body4.73e-11129
craniocervical region4.73e-11129
head6.18e-10123
ectoderm3.11e-08173
presumptive ectoderm3.11e-08173
ectoderm-derived structure7.93e-08169
basal ganglion8.65e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis8.65e-079
aggregate regional part of brain8.65e-079
collection of basal ganglia8.65e-079
cerebral subcortex8.65e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.