Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3314

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:39, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3314_leiomyoma_Endothelial_Renal_Monocytederived_testicular_smallcell_mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:6309493..6309505,+p2@CD9
Hg19::chr12:6309517..6309575,+p1@CD9
Hg19::chr12:6344660..6344678,+p@chr12:6344660..6344678
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-cellular organism1.06e-23659
anatomical system2.14e-21625
anatomical group2.39e-21626
embryo7.87e-21612
embryonic structure3.14e-18605
developing anatomical structure3.14e-18605
germ layer6.10e-18604
embryonic tissue6.10e-18604
presumptive structure6.10e-18604
epiblast (generic)6.10e-18604
anatomical conduit2.83e-16241
anatomical cluster5.01e-16286
organ1.35e-12511
vessel5.72e-1169
simple squamous epithelium4.55e-1022
endothelium8.05e-1018
blood vessel endothelium8.05e-1018
cardiovascular system endothelium8.05e-1018
blood vessel2.42e-0960
epithelial tube open at both ends2.42e-0960
blood vasculature2.42e-0960
vascular cord2.42e-0960
squamous epithelium3.31e-0925
vasculature4.18e-0979
vascular system4.18e-0979
mesoderm7.25e-09448
mesoderm-derived structure7.25e-09448
presumptive mesoderm7.25e-09448
urogenital ridge1.01e-0820
epithelium1.17e-08309
organ part1.20e-08219
cell layer1.30e-08312
anatomical space1.34e-08104
epithelial tube3.00e-08118
tube3.32e-08194
mesonephros5.87e-0818
pronephros5.87e-0818
nephrogenic cord5.87e-0818
pronephric mesoderm5.87e-0818
rostral part of nephrogenic cord5.87e-0818
presumptive pronephric mesoderm5.87e-0818
multi-tissue structure8.27e-08347
intermediate mesoderm9.11e-0837
excretory tube2.36e-0717
mesonephric epithelium2.36e-0717
mesonephric tubule2.36e-0717
nephric duct2.36e-0717
kidney epithelium2.36e-0717
renal duct2.36e-0717
mesonephric duct2.36e-0717
pronephric duct2.36e-0717
respiratory system3.10e-0772
nephron epithelium3.59e-0716
nephron3.59e-0716
uriniferous tubule3.59e-0716
metanephric mesenchyme3.59e-0716
nephrogenic mesenchyme3.59e-0716
orifice4.04e-0735
mouth5.14e-0728
stomodeum5.14e-0728
oral opening5.41e-0721
renal system6.54e-0745
urinary system structure7.08e-0744
duct7.77e-0726
cortex of kidney8.46e-0713
renal parenchyma8.46e-0713
endoderm-derived structure9.08e-07169
endoderm9.08e-07169
presumptive endoderm9.08e-07169


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ESR1#2099330.76860329615453.43136389821584e-050.000674385047357478



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.