Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2377

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:05, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2377_pineal_occipital_peripheral_Astrocyte_parietal_skeletal_diaphragm



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:49891062..49891082,-p@chr16:49891062..49891082
-
Hg19::chr16:49891086..49891107,-p@chr16:49891086..49891107
-
Hg19::chr16:49891112..49891125,-p@chr16:49891112..49891125
-
Hg19::chr16:49891128..49891158,-p@chr16:49891128..49891158
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectodermal cell1.38e-0859
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system9.58e-3494
nervous system9.58e-3494
central nervous system2.20e-3382
adult organism2.76e-32115
neurectoderm4.00e-3290
neural plate8.49e-3086
presumptive neural plate8.49e-3086
neural tube9.20e-3057
neural rod9.20e-3057
future spinal cord9.20e-3057
neural keel9.20e-3057
regional part of brain2.11e-2659
brain1.39e-2569
future brain1.39e-2569
ectoderm1.78e-24173
presumptive ectoderm1.78e-24173
ectoderm-derived structure1.42e-22169
anterior neural tube1.39e-2142
regional part of forebrain6.30e-2141
forebrain6.30e-2141
future forebrain6.30e-2141
pre-chordal neural plate7.74e-2061
anterior region of body2.58e-19129
craniocervical region2.58e-19129
head3.66e-19123
gray matter1.76e-1734
brain grey matter1.76e-1734
telencephalon3.10e-1734
regional part of telencephalon9.93e-1733
cerebral hemisphere2.17e-1632
tube3.12e-15194
anatomical cluster1.37e-14286
cell layer2.59e-14312
multi-cellular organism2.79e-14659
epithelium7.04e-14309
anatomical conduit7.54e-14241
cerebral cortex1.23e-1325
pallium1.23e-1325
regional part of cerebral cortex3.24e-1222
neocortex1.12e-1120
embryo1.72e-11612
organism subdivision2.01e-11365
multi-tissue structure4.62e-11347
organ part5.33e-10219
posterior neural tube2.71e-0915
chordal neural plate2.71e-0915
anatomical system3.81e-09625
anatomical group5.48e-09626
embryonic structure5.58e-09605
developing anatomical structure5.58e-09605
germ layer1.16e-08604
embryonic tissue1.16e-08604
presumptive structure1.16e-08604
epiblast (generic)1.16e-08604
segmental subdivision of nervous system7.40e-0813
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.16e-0712
hindbrain1.16e-0712
presumptive hindbrain1.16e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00816702043604586
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.00391408901074515
RAD21#5885410.35503389545638.6948481184721e-050.00129264233828485
REST#597849.650028716128020.0001152825614219170.00156893346785817
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.00115331429659581
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00248584723964432



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.