Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C704

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:23, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C704_Eosinophils_CD14CD16_Neutrophils_CD14_CD4_Basophils_Peripheral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:2303458..2303472,+p@chr17:2303458..2303472
+
Hg19::chr17:2303504..2303517,+p@chr17:2303504..2303517
+
Hg19::chr17:2303522..2303540,+p@chr17:2303522..2303540
+
Hg19::chr19:12893132..12893144,-p@chr19:12893132..12893144
-
Hg19::chr19:12893177..12893196,-p@chr19:12893177..12893196
-
Hg19::chr1:12234102..12234139,+p@chr1:12234102..12234139
+
Hg19::chr1:244211415..244211427,-p@chr1:244211415..244211427
-
Hg19::chr2:220041798..220041847,+p@chr2:220041798..220041847
+
Hg19::chr5:1386102..1386116,+p@chr5:1386102..1386116
+
Hg19::chr5:98265529..98265551,+p@chr5:98265529..98265551
+
Hg19::chr5:98265553..98265578,+p@chr5:98265553..98265578
+
Hg19::chr6:170862932..170862947,+p5@TBP


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte5.76e-43140
hematopoietic stem cell2.21e-40172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.21e-40172
hematopoietic cell6.66e-39182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.00e-37165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.00e-37165
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.21e-34124
nongranular leukocyte1.94e-32119
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.13e-2442
classical monocyte6.15e-2345
myeloid leukocyte6.63e-2276
myeloid cell6.53e-21112
common myeloid progenitor6.53e-21112
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.41e-1871
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.86e-1870
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.03e-1665
monopoietic cell1.00e-1563
monocyte1.00e-1563
monoblast1.00e-1563
promonocyte1.00e-1563
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.55e-1552
lymphocyte8.01e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor8.01e-1553
mesenchymal cell1.09e-12358
connective tissue cell2.13e-12365
mature alpha-beta T cell2.24e-1018
alpha-beta T cell2.24e-1018
immature T cell2.24e-1018
mature T cell2.24e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell2.24e-1018
motile cell4.58e-10390
T cell1.24e-0925
pro-T cell1.24e-0925
multi fate stem cell4.24e-08430
somatic stem cell2.05e-07436
intermediate monocyte2.37e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.37e-079
stem cell2.73e-07444
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.63e-24102
blood island5.63e-24102
hemolymphoid system1.62e-23112
immune system2.81e-17115
bone marrow5.25e-1780
bone element2.48e-1586
skeletal element6.28e-12101
skeletal system6.28e-12101
connective tissue8.84e-11375
lateral plate mesoderm1.10e-09216
blood9.33e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid9.33e-0715
organism substance9.33e-0715


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90584.224134384641760.0001042269793544080.00145370746484976
CEBPB#105163.985573812912410.001827907733545880.0108247253222839
CHD2#110665.172011417058430.0004497895363246330.00418416045107405
CTCF#1066462.680128186537510.01385375074811150.0487293504776375
E2F1#186983.271592809919550.000663878513766830.00542738223869229
E2F6#187693.762866798773046.04050132232551e-050.000991768460308683
EBF1#187985.937644564379348.2084546063492e-060.00022703463734971
EGR1#195893.74113432110766.33970241327135e-050.00103406556354778
ELF1#199772.483890475971060.009986512778965350.0374580307471039
HEY1#2346272.356731441811660.01346982061264720.0475808223961394
HMGN3#932485.452365148900391.56099565068508e-050.000365781522912046
MYC#460993.916711403707054.32027414396341e-050.000770368979548223
NR3C1#290867.486511665586525.75824923499379e-050.000960066717518386
PAX5#507963.334782765588910.004629821511058920.0218625459507837
PBX3#5090610.95725634337216.55956664029628e-060.000193305468494894
POLR2A#5430101.789544313798390.01056859658770230.0390536623508842
PRDM1#639221.97182596291010.003608092359441310.0182632461555611
SIN3A#2594262.704442363407570.01325491342780750.0468882910000943
SMARCC1#6599310.91583982990790.002261599214152550.0128424945806263
SPI1#668864.102161754261360.001568896548030080.00995044553225926
TAF1#687282.228697523830190.009307457816451660.0351584775351705
TBP#690892.780078015322290.000724921312220490.00578292521593307
ZBTB7A#5134174.288613762927610.0003629129921758860.00362458353159198
ZEB1#693545.629477339181290.0041376490332310.0197194454404314



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.