Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1203

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:30, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr6:103460829..103460861,+p7@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460868..103460892,+p9@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460902..103460911,+p11@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460920..103460944,+p4@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103460954..103461002,+p5@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103461006..103461072,+p3@Chl1
Mm9::chr6:103461350..103461367,+p1@Chl1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system4.44e-3175
central nervous system4.39e-3073
ectoderm-derived structure1.33e-2995
ectoderm1.33e-2995
presumptive ectoderm1.33e-2995
neurectoderm2.45e-2164
neural plate2.45e-2164
presumptive neural plate2.45e-2164
regional part of nervous system3.36e-2154
ecto-epithelium3.41e-2173
neural tube2.91e-2052
neural rod2.91e-2052
future spinal cord2.91e-2052
neural keel2.91e-2052
gray matter7.41e-1934
brain8.26e-1747
future brain8.26e-1747
regional part of brain1.46e-1646
anterior neural tube1.12e-1540
brain grey matter1.15e-1529
regional part of telencephalon1.15e-1529
telencephalon1.15e-1529
regional part of forebrain3.89e-1539
forebrain3.89e-1539
future forebrain3.89e-1539
pre-chordal neural plate5.72e-1549
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.63e-1292
cerebral cortex2.66e-1121
cerebral hemisphere2.66e-1121
pallium2.66e-1121
regional part of cerebral cortex3.18e-0917
peripheral nervous system1.73e-0711
occipital lobe7.98e-0710
visual cortex7.98e-0710
neocortex7.98e-0710
autonomic nervous system8.25e-079


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}