Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3414

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:01, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr3:68673259..68673321,+p1@1110032F04Rik
Mm9::chr3:68673485..68673511,+p2@1110032F04Rik
Mm9::chr3:68673568..68673581,+p3@1110032F04Rik


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system2.00e-1554
gray matter2.00e-1534
neural tube1.81e-1452
neural rod1.81e-1452
future spinal cord1.81e-1452
neural keel1.81e-1452
anterior neural tube4.69e-1340
brain1.03e-1247
future brain1.03e-1247
regional part of forebrain1.59e-1239
forebrain1.59e-1239
future forebrain1.59e-1239
brain grey matter1.60e-1229
regional part of telencephalon1.60e-1229
telencephalon1.60e-1229
regional part of brain2.59e-1246
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest5.96e-1292
neurectoderm1.89e-1164
neural plate1.89e-1164
presumptive neural plate1.89e-1164
pre-chordal neural plate3.90e-1149
central nervous system6.26e-1173
ecto-epithelium2.41e-1073
nervous system3.39e-1075
occipital lobe9.57e-0910
visual cortex9.57e-0910
neocortex9.57e-0910
cerebral cortex1.24e-0821
cerebral hemisphere1.24e-0821
pallium1.24e-0821
organ part1.19e-0799
ectoderm-derived structure1.60e-0795
ectoderm1.60e-0795
presumptive ectoderm1.60e-0795
epithelium1.73e-07174
cavitated compound organ2.59e-0721
multi-tissue structure3.33e-07230
cell layer3.97e-07176
organ4.57e-07266
tube9.64e-07114
anatomical cluster9.82e-07244


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}