Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:791

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:15, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:69413736..69413739,-p@chr11:69413736..69413739
-
Mm9::chr11:69414174..69414182,-p@chr11:69414174..69414182
-
Mm9::chr11:69414336..69414343,-p@chr11:69414336..69414343
-
Mm9::chr11:69414671..69414691,-p@chr11:69414671..69414691
-
Mm9::chr11:69414732..69414752,-p@chr11:69414732..69414752
-
Mm9::chr6:48490487..48490499,+p@chr6:48490487..48490499
+
Mm9::chr7:149558247..149558276,-p3@6330512M04Rik
Mm9::chr8:113253955..113253976,+p@chr8:113253955..113253976
+
Mm9::chr8:113256021..113256034,+p@chr8:113256021..113256034
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system2.28e-3073
nervous system6.46e-2975
ectoderm-derived structure2.38e-2795
ectoderm2.38e-2795
presumptive ectoderm2.38e-2795
regional part of nervous system6.50e-2754
neural tube3.87e-2552
neural rod3.87e-2552
future spinal cord3.87e-2552
neural keel3.87e-2552
neurectoderm9.75e-2364
neural plate9.75e-2364
presumptive neural plate9.75e-2364
ecto-epithelium5.00e-2173
brain5.07e-2147
future brain5.07e-2147
regional part of brain3.28e-2046
gray matter2.42e-1734
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.64e-1692
anterior neural tube3.21e-1540
pre-chordal neural plate3.44e-1549
regional part of forebrain2.01e-1439
forebrain2.01e-1439
future forebrain2.01e-1439
brain grey matter1.51e-1329
regional part of telencephalon1.51e-1329
telencephalon1.51e-1329
posterior neural tube2.71e-1112
chordal neural plate2.71e-1112
cerebral cortex6.60e-1021
cerebral hemisphere6.60e-1021
pallium6.60e-1021
regional part of cerebral cortex2.99e-0917
occipital lobe2.48e-0810
visual cortex2.48e-0810
neocortex2.48e-0810
tube1.38e-07114
anatomical conduit3.35e-07122


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}