Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1557

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:26, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1557_Basophils_Mast_CD34_CD14_CD133_immature_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:104535830..104535842,-p@chr10:104535830..104535842
-
Hg19::chr10:80844036..80844053,-p@chr10:80844036..80844053
-
Hg19::chr14:90379404..90379417,+p@chr14:90379404..90379417
+
Hg19::chr19:6067113..6067123,+p@chr19:6067113..6067123
+
Hg19::chr20:1448681..1448685,+p@chr20:1448681..1448685
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte2.95e-5642
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.95e-5642
defensive cell2.47e-4848
phagocyte2.47e-4848
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.63e-4767
myeloid leukocyte6.18e-4772
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.02e-4261
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.10e-4166
monopoietic cell3.01e-3759
monocyte3.01e-3759
monoblast3.01e-3759
promonocyte3.01e-3759
myeloid cell5.29e-35108
common myeloid progenitor5.29e-35108
leukocyte3.26e-31136
stuff accumulating cell1.31e-2787
hematopoietic stem cell1.27e-26168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.27e-26168
hematopoietic cell8.85e-25177
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.21e-24120
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell5.36e-22161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell5.36e-22161
nongranular leukocyte6.95e-22115
intermediate monocyte5.23e-199
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte5.23e-199
mesenchymal cell8.03e-13354
basophil1.29e-123
connective tissue cell2.29e-12361
motile cell9.21e-11386
single nucleate cell1.66e-103
mononuclear cell1.66e-103
stem cell1.26e-09441
multi fate stem cell8.30e-09427
somatic stem cell1.54e-08433
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell1.80e-082
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell1.80e-082
histamine secreting cell1.01e-075
biogenic amine secreting cell1.01e-075
granulocytopoietic cell1.01e-075
mast cell1.01e-075
mast cell progenitor1.01e-075
basophil mast progenitor cell1.01e-075
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow8.62e-4476
hematopoietic system1.77e-4198
blood island1.77e-4198
bone element5.17e-4082
hemolymphoid system7.90e-37108
skeletal element9.42e-3690
immune system2.42e-3493
skeletal system2.23e-31100
lateral plate mesoderm1.07e-17203
musculoskeletal system1.43e-15167
connective tissue9.59e-12371
mesoderm6.50e-09315
mesoderm-derived structure6.50e-09315
presumptive mesoderm6.50e-09315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203345.419153380978560.00209386927943890.0121119697410867
FOXA1#316936.648851849631270.006389025166568720.0278026416404696
FOXA2#3170314.77827825159910.0006289192851194480.00517235224967241
JUN#3725410.01026335386910.0001908531347801070.00230407011250717
TAL1#6886317.92117000646410.0003565266732321920.00356728197218786



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.