Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2319

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:52, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2319_Eosinophils_large_immature_Neutrophils_small_migratory_Mast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:88459407..88459418,-p4@GALC
Hg19::chr14:88459424..88459442,-p5@GALC
Hg19::chr14:88459457..88459484,-p2@GALC
Hg19::chr14:88459487..88459500,-p3@GALC


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukocyte8.67e-3072
myeloid cell1.27e-28108
common myeloid progenitor1.27e-28108
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell6.93e-2767
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.13e-2566
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.19e-2361
leukocyte4.83e-22136
defensive cell4.83e-2248
phagocyte4.83e-2248
monopoietic cell7.17e-2259
monocyte7.17e-2259
monoblast7.17e-2259
promonocyte7.17e-2259
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell8.82e-22161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell8.82e-22161
hematopoietic stem cell1.75e-21168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.75e-21168
classical monocyte4.95e-2042
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte4.95e-2042
hematopoietic cell1.57e-19177
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.09e-17120
nongranular leukocyte1.55e-14115
stuff accumulating cell5.74e-0887
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system4.47e-2798
blood island4.47e-2798
adult organism1.54e-26114
hemolymphoid system4.53e-24108
bone marrow3.27e-2176
bone element1.27e-1982
immune system2.31e-1993
skeletal element4.09e-1790
skeletal system1.09e-15100
neural tube8.26e-1456
neural rod8.26e-1456
future spinal cord8.26e-1456
neural keel8.26e-1456
lateral plate mesoderm2.24e-12203
regional part of nervous system2.31e-1253
regional part of brain2.31e-1253
regional part of forebrain1.94e-1141
forebrain1.94e-1141
anterior neural tube1.94e-1141
future forebrain1.94e-1141
brain grey matter2.03e-0934
gray matter2.03e-0934
telencephalon4.08e-0934
central nervous system6.29e-0981
regional part of telencephalon1.50e-0832
cerebral hemisphere3.15e-0832
musculoskeletal system8.74e-08167
brain1.31e-0768
future brain1.31e-0768
neural plate1.39e-0782
presumptive neural plate1.39e-0782
regional part of cerebral cortex2.67e-0722
nervous system3.95e-0789


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467422.46317452600873.92475754624726e-060.000127218421282594
BCL11A#53335428.36945510360711.542446414682e-065.8856982500173e-05
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00816280411160805
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.010637157853164
E2F6#187645.017155731697390.00157802193473060.00995993429874473
ELF1#199744.258097958807540.003041525565781240.016072348136239
GATA1#2623413.56030814380042.95627390049268e-050.000613573708055554
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.018576512310463
IRF1#365947.63716375356390.0002938853996185490.00307115241652608
IRF4#3662421.91451268674414.33289161192893e-060.000136220008145167
MAX#414946.452555509007120.0005767613195645490.00484955925078511
NFKB1#479045.488063424193840.001102199566301980.00767315161345236
PAX5#507946.669565531177830.0005052774169483260.00443450992845934
POU2F2#545249.106124057742520.000145395665174930.00188235749041831
SIN3A#2594245.408884726815140.001168172384885160.00795272509647486
SIX5#147912417.0867153554591.17257016123224e-050.000297310160400421
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0321702053234129
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0243806594939291
TCF12#6938410.63446490218647.8163066689251e-050.00119924673453191
THAP1#55145431.36914460285131.03171810326891e-064.31351509156532e-05
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00507401946136296
USF2#7392412.99219738506963.50833029870167e-050.000680673431295009
YY1#752844.911170749853860.00171871838055440.0106699892377531
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00248395562852599



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.