Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4319

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:40, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4319_extraskeletal_thyroid_pituitary_cerebellum_aorta_parietal_colon



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:2140383..2140394,+p13@CNTN4
Hg19::chr3:2140446..2140470,+p4@CNTN4
Hg19::chr3:2140476..2140505,+p3@CNTN4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.31e-58114
neurectoderm6.06e-3586
neural tube6.37e-3556
neural rod6.37e-3556
future spinal cord6.37e-3556
neural keel6.37e-3556
neural plate1.86e-3482
presumptive neural plate1.86e-3482
regional part of nervous system2.01e-3153
regional part of brain2.01e-3153
organ system subdivision1.75e-28223
ecto-epithelium5.55e-27104
regional part of forebrain5.69e-2641
forebrain5.69e-2641
anterior neural tube5.69e-2641
future forebrain5.69e-2641
central nervous system1.69e-2481
pre-chordal neural plate1.71e-2461
brain6.55e-2468
future brain6.55e-2468
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.80e-24132
nervous system7.25e-2389
neocortex1.20e-2020
cerebral hemisphere1.79e-2032
telencephalon2.36e-2034
regional part of cerebral cortex3.44e-2022
brain grey matter4.05e-2034
gray matter4.05e-2034
ectoderm-derived structure1.43e-19171
ectoderm1.43e-19171
presumptive ectoderm1.43e-19171
regional part of telencephalon2.13e-1832
anatomical cluster7.29e-18373
cerebral cortex3.94e-1725
pallium3.94e-1725
multi-tissue structure1.55e-16342
intestine5.48e-1517
organ9.31e-14503
gastrointestinal system3.33e-1225
organ part1.35e-11218
embryo7.49e-11592
embryonic structure1.05e-10564
developing anatomical structure1.67e-10581
germ layer2.04e-10560
germ layer / neural crest2.04e-10560
embryonic tissue2.04e-10560
presumptive structure2.04e-10560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.04e-10560
epiblast (generic)2.04e-10560
posterior neural tube5.74e-1015
chordal neural plate5.74e-1015
epithelium7.63e-10306
gyrus9.84e-106
multi-cellular organism1.22e-09656
cell layer1.49e-09309
anatomical conduit2.70e-09240
large intestine4.23e-0911
tube4.52e-09192
colon7.63e-099
anatomical system9.45e-09624
anatomical group1.10e-08625
occipital lobe4.68e-085
subdivision of digestive tract2.01e-07118
digestive system2.87e-07145
digestive tract2.87e-07145
primitive gut2.87e-07145
diencephalon3.47e-077
future diencephalon3.47e-077
segmental subdivision of hindbrain9.80e-0712
hindbrain9.80e-0712
presumptive hindbrain9.80e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280496059340504
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326675359955761
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157231334716715
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00472407340957115
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00666428579968182
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247320096671392



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.