Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:659

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:42, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:69734729..69734745,-p2@Eif5a
Mm9::chr13:117814641..117814661,-p5@Parp8
Mm9::chr14:75578208..75578243,-p@chr14:75578208..75578243
-
Mm9::chr14:75579064..75579079,-p@chr14:75579064..75579079
-
Mm9::chr15:80085920..80085941,+p1@Atf4
Mm9::chr17:35337680..35337691,+p@chr17:35337680..35337691
+
Mm9::chr1:58784094..58784105,+p@chr1:58784094..58784105
+
Mm9::chr4:107552410..107552428,+p2@Magoh
Mm9::chr4:107552434..107552445,+p3@Magoh
Mm9::chr5:3543862..3543884,+p2@Fam133b
Mm9::chr9:107192037..107192117,-p1@Mapkapk3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic cell2.40e-1632
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.40e-1632
hematopoietic stem cell2.40e-1632
angioblastic mesenchymal cell2.40e-1632
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.40e-1632
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.81e-1212
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.24e-1125
T cell2.66e-1111
pro-T cell2.66e-1111
lymphocyte3.35e-1113
common lymphoid progenitor3.35e-1113
connective tissue cell3.68e-1146
mesenchymal cell3.68e-1146
leukocyte7.87e-1017
nongranular leukocyte7.87e-1017
mature alpha-beta T cell1.38e-099
alpha-beta T cell1.38e-099
immature T cell1.38e-099
mature T cell1.38e-099
immature alpha-beta T cell1.38e-099
nucleate cell4.52e-0916
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.08e-088
motile cell2.86e-0754
thymocyte4.68e-076
double negative thymocyte4.68e-076
naive T cell4.68e-076
double-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte4.68e-076
CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte4.68e-076
naive thymus-derived CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.68e-076
DN4 thymocyte4.68e-076
DN1 thymic pro-T cell4.68e-076
DN2 thymocyte4.68e-076
DN3 thymocyte4.68e-076
immature single positive thymocyte4.68e-076
early T lineage precursor4.68e-076
mature CD4 single-positive thymocyte4.68e-076
resting double-positive thymocyte4.68e-076
double-positive blast4.68e-076
CD69-positive double-positive thymocyte4.68e-076
CD69-positive, CD4-positive single-positive thymocyte4.68e-076
CD4-positive, CD8-intermediate double-positive thymocyte4.68e-076
CD24-positive, CD4 single-positive thymocyte4.68e-076
common myeloid progenitor4.73e-0719

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.09e-1845
blood island3.09e-1845
hemolymphoid system3.79e-1848
immune system3.79e-1848
hemopoietic organ7.70e-1529
immune organ7.70e-1529
segment of respiratory tract1.65e-1227
thymus2.55e-1223
neck2.55e-1223
respiratory system epithelium2.55e-1223
hemolymphoid system gland2.55e-1223
pharyngeal epithelium2.55e-1223
thymic region2.55e-1223
pharyngeal gland2.55e-1223
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.55e-1223
thymus primordium2.55e-1223
early pharyngeal endoderm2.55e-1223
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure3.35e-1235
pharynx8.89e-1224
gland of gut8.89e-1224
upper respiratory tract8.89e-1224
chordate pharynx8.89e-1224
pharyngeal arch system8.89e-1224
pharyngeal region of foregut8.89e-1224
connective tissue3.68e-1146
gut epithelium2.35e-0855
lateral plate mesoderm2.94e-0887
foregut3.69e-0880
organ segment6.76e-0835
respiratory tract7.39e-0841
unilaminar epithelium1.07e-0766
respiratory system1.20e-0742
craniocervical region1.33e-0736
anterior region of body2.06e-0743


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}