Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2754: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0,

Latest revision as of 12:12, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2754_temporal_duodenum_nonsmall_occipital_parietal_Nucleus_putamen



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:79817111..79817121,-p11@ROBO1
Hg19::chr3:79817136..79817155,-p4@ROBO1
Hg19::chr3:79817162..79817175,-p6@ROBO1
Hg19::chr3:79817277..79817296,-p9@ROBO1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system7.94e-4981
nervous system1.14e-4789
neural tube1.63e-4556
neural rod1.63e-4556
future spinal cord1.63e-4556
neural keel1.63e-4556
brain7.50e-4368
future brain7.50e-4368
regional part of nervous system1.96e-4153
regional part of brain1.96e-4153
neural plate2.88e-3682
presumptive neural plate2.88e-3682
neurectoderm1.55e-3586
regional part of forebrain1.94e-3541
forebrain1.94e-3541
anterior neural tube1.94e-3541
future forebrain1.94e-3541
brain grey matter1.64e-3134
gray matter1.64e-3134
cerebral hemisphere4.95e-3132
telencephalon6.67e-3134
pre-chordal neural plate3.10e-3061
regional part of telencephalon1.52e-2832
ecto-epithelium9.00e-27104
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.29e-26132
ectoderm-derived structure4.70e-26171
ectoderm4.70e-26171
presumptive ectoderm4.70e-26171
cerebral cortex5.97e-2425
pallium5.97e-2425
regional part of cerebral cortex3.36e-2322
organ system subdivision7.39e-23223
adult organism1.20e-20114
neocortex1.87e-2020
anatomical cluster5.64e-17373
posterior neural tube5.12e-1115
chordal neural plate5.12e-1115
multi-tissue structure4.61e-10342
tube4.97e-10192
intervertebral cartilage3.16e-095
symphysis3.16e-095
nonsynovial joint3.16e-095
fibrous joint3.16e-095
cartilaginous joint3.16e-095
developing mesenchymal condensation3.16e-095
pre-cartilage condensation3.16e-095
cartilaginous condensation3.16e-095
cartilage element3.16e-095
post-cranial axial skeletal system3.16e-095
vertebral column3.16e-095
intervertebral disk3.16e-095
intervertebral joint3.16e-095
brain vasculature3.55e-095
limbic system5.64e-095
neural nucleus6.01e-099
nucleus of brain6.01e-099
basal ganglion7.87e-099
nuclear complex of neuraxis7.87e-099
aggregate regional part of brain7.87e-099
collection of basal ganglia7.87e-099
cerebral subcortex7.87e-099
vasculature of organ1.31e-0811
temporal lobe2.20e-086
parietal lobe4.55e-085
cell layer6.31e-08309
epithelium1.10e-07306
segmental subdivision of hindbrain2.07e-0712
hindbrain2.07e-0712
presumptive hindbrain2.07e-0712
embryo2.66e-07592
brainstem3.64e-076
anatomical conduit4.91e-07240


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.233555
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.13.35236
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.12.77736
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.11.01899
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.21.83323
MA0039.20.0247757
MA0138.22.1393
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.11.84959
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.0021048
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00508697371561249



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.