Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1283

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:40, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:31901842..31901853,+p@chr11:31901842..31901853
+
Mm9::chr11:77766933..77766944,+p2@Sez6
Mm9::chr11:77766969..77766981,+p4@Sez6
Mm9::chr11:77767355..77767365,+p@chr11:77767355..77767365
+
Mm9::chr11:98614826..98614845,+p9@Thra
Mm9::chr17:56575523..56575550,-p5@Ptprs


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.49e-4673
nervous system9.69e-4575
regional part of nervous system1.58e-4454
neurectoderm4.99e-4464
neural plate4.99e-4464
presumptive neural plate4.99e-4464
neural tube4.95e-4252
neural rod4.95e-4252
future spinal cord4.95e-4252
neural keel4.95e-4252
ectoderm-derived structure6.94e-4195
ectoderm6.94e-4195
presumptive ectoderm6.94e-4195
brain9.94e-3747
future brain9.94e-3747
ecto-epithelium3.73e-3673
pre-chordal neural plate6.49e-3649
regional part of brain1.57e-3546
gray matter7.11e-3534
anterior neural tube1.01e-3240
regional part of forebrain6.42e-3239
forebrain6.42e-3239
future forebrain6.42e-3239
brain grey matter2.14e-2929
regional part of telencephalon2.14e-2929
telencephalon2.14e-2929
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.17e-2592
cerebral cortex5.68e-2221
cerebral hemisphere5.68e-2221
pallium5.68e-2221
regional part of cerebral cortex7.15e-1817
occipital lobe9.27e-1210
visual cortex9.27e-1210
neocortex9.27e-1210
tube3.39e-10114
posterior neural tube3.13e-0912
chordal neural plate3.13e-0912
anatomical conduit1.39e-08122
basal ganglion2.01e-088
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.01e-088
aggregate regional part of brain2.01e-088
collection of basal ganglia2.01e-088
cerebral subcortex2.01e-088
Ammon's horn1.50e-077
lobe parts of cerebral cortex1.50e-077
hippocampal formation1.50e-077
limbic system1.50e-077
limbic lobe1.50e-077
spinal cord4.40e-076
dorsal region element4.40e-076
dorsum4.40e-076


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}