Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1961

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:13, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1961_Neural_cerebellum_medulla_mesothelioma_hippocampus_spinal_Astrocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:36607366..36607379,+p@chr5:36607366..36607379
+
Hg19::chr5:36608318..36608354,+p2@SLC1A3
Hg19::chr5:36608367..36608383,+p3@SLC1A3
Hg19::chr5:36608422..36608435,+p4@SLC1A3
Hg19::chr5:36687555..36687567,+p@chr5:36687555..36687567
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube5.05e-7656
neural rod5.05e-7656
future spinal cord5.05e-7656
neural keel5.05e-7656
central nervous system9.33e-7481
regional part of nervous system4.94e-7053
regional part of brain4.94e-7053
nervous system3.28e-6789
brain1.04e-6168
future brain1.04e-6168
neural plate1.02e-5682
presumptive neural plate1.02e-5682
telencephalon5.67e-5434
brain grey matter8.44e-5434
gray matter8.44e-5434
neurectoderm2.18e-5386
regional part of forebrain7.41e-5341
forebrain7.41e-5341
anterior neural tube7.41e-5341
future forebrain7.41e-5341
cerebral hemisphere3.38e-5032
regional part of telencephalon6.77e-5032
ecto-epithelium1.43e-41104
pre-chordal neural plate5.40e-4161
cerebral cortex9.48e-3725
pallium9.48e-3725
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.50e-35132
ectoderm-derived structure8.24e-34171
ectoderm8.24e-34171
presumptive ectoderm8.24e-34171
regional part of cerebral cortex2.76e-3122
adult organism9.64e-31114
neocortex2.59e-2720
organ system subdivision4.24e-24223
posterior neural tube2.31e-2315
chordal neural plate2.31e-2315
neural nucleus1.81e-189
nucleus of brain1.81e-189
basal ganglion2.28e-189
nuclear complex of neuraxis2.28e-189
aggregate regional part of brain2.28e-189
collection of basal ganglia2.28e-189
cerebral subcortex2.28e-189
segmental subdivision of hindbrain1.07e-1712
hindbrain1.07e-1712
presumptive hindbrain1.07e-1712
tube9.34e-17192
segmental subdivision of nervous system3.87e-1613
telencephalic nucleus1.17e-147
gyrus9.47e-146
brainstem9.68e-146
anatomical cluster8.04e-13373
anatomical conduit1.19e-12240
regional part of metencephalon1.32e-119
metencephalon1.32e-119
future metencephalon1.32e-119
limbic system1.50e-115
cell layer4.19e-11309
epithelium8.59e-11306
organ part1.31e-10218
multi-tissue structure1.64e-09342
corpus striatum2.67e-094
striatum2.67e-094
ventral part of telencephalon2.67e-094
future corpus striatum2.67e-094
medulla oblongata3.80e-083
myelencephalon3.80e-083
future myelencephalon3.80e-083
temporal lobe4.91e-086
parietal lobe8.07e-085
frontal cortex1.16e-073
spinal cord1.92e-073
dorsal region element1.92e-073
dorsum1.92e-073
pons2.82e-073
caudate-putamen3.01e-073
dorsal striatum3.01e-073
occipital lobe4.17e-075
germ layer4.89e-07560
germ layer / neural crest4.89e-07560
embryonic tissue4.89e-07560
presumptive structure4.89e-07560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure4.89e-07560
epiblast (generic)4.89e-07560
embryonic structure7.54e-07564


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105157.971147625824823.10621793420244e-050.000629067858891154
GTF2F1#2962410.19172870140610.000177833889427640.00215987830886537
TFAP2A#702039.911180623826970.002021546977511280.0117469729474378
TFAP2C#702236.485537165916130.006858951517940.0290652453778356



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.