Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2622

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:37, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2622_Osteoblast_Chondrocyte_meningioma_Fibroblast_mesenchymal_Smooth_tenocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr20:57090346..57090361,-p6@APCDD1L
Hg19::chr20:57090369..57090380,-p7@APCDD1L
Hg19::chr20:57090389..57090412,-p3@APCDD1L
Hg19::chr20:57090438..57090462,-p1@APCDD1L


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multilaminar epithelium9.03e-2383
somite2.99e-2271
presomitic mesoderm2.99e-2271
presumptive segmental plate2.99e-2271
dermomyotome2.99e-2271
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.99e-2271
dense mesenchyme tissue3.35e-2273
paraxial mesoderm1.17e-2172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.17e-2172
epithelial vesicle4.05e-2178
muscle tissue1.92e-1864
musculature1.92e-1864
musculature of body1.92e-1864
skeletal muscle tissue5.29e-1862
striated muscle tissue5.29e-1862
myotome5.29e-1862
mesenchyme6.63e-14160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.63e-14160
systemic artery2.13e-1333
systemic arterial system2.13e-1333
artery2.46e-1342
arterial blood vessel2.46e-1342
arterial system2.46e-1342
trunk mesenchyme2.06e-12122
mesoderm4.27e-12315
mesoderm-derived structure4.27e-12315
presumptive mesoderm4.27e-12315
surface structure2.28e-0999
musculoskeletal system3.30e-09167
smooth muscle tissue5.42e-0915
integument9.54e-0946
integumental system9.54e-0946
blood vessel smooth muscle2.21e-0810
arterial system smooth muscle2.21e-0810
artery smooth muscle tissue2.21e-0810
aorta smooth muscle tissue2.21e-0810
skin of body5.52e-0841
epithelial tube open at both ends1.14e-0759
blood vessel1.14e-0759
blood vasculature1.14e-0759
vascular cord1.14e-0759
unilaminar epithelium2.51e-07148
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.08e-0783
connective tissue7.10e-07371
trunk9.01e-07199
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer5.41e-1014
female reproductive organ cancer5.74e-0727


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
MYC#460945.22228187160940.001344309395272740.00888315905934131
USF1#739146.361499277207960.0006105011399140830.00508372895483072



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.