Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2201

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:01, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2201_medulla_globus_hippocampus_thalamus_occipital_amygdala_locus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:21680559..21680570,+p15@C12orf39
Hg19::chr9:87429287..87429322,+p13@NTRK2
Hg19::chr9:87429359..87429371,+p39@NTRK2
Hg19::chr9:87430449..87430453,+p29@NTRK2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0043121neurotrophin binding0.0170718784065629



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube1.68e-7356
neural rod1.68e-7356
future spinal cord1.68e-7356
neural keel1.68e-7356
regional part of nervous system4.68e-6853
regional part of brain4.68e-6853
neural plate9.32e-6382
presumptive neural plate9.32e-6382
adult organism1.01e-62114
neurectoderm4.08e-6186
regional part of forebrain7.93e-5741
forebrain7.93e-5741
anterior neural tube7.93e-5741
future forebrain7.93e-5741
central nervous system1.40e-5681
brain1.85e-5668
future brain1.85e-5668
brain grey matter5.46e-5234
gray matter5.46e-5234
telencephalon1.86e-5134
nervous system2.71e-4989
regional part of telencephalon3.32e-4832
cerebral hemisphere6.47e-4832
ecto-epithelium1.26e-47104
pre-chordal neural plate7.56e-4561
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.60e-44132
regional part of cerebral cortex6.37e-3922
cerebral cortex2.38e-3625
pallium2.38e-3625
ectoderm-derived structure1.80e-35171
ectoderm1.80e-35171
presumptive ectoderm1.80e-35171
neocortex3.73e-3520
organ system subdivision6.32e-20223
posterior neural tube4.34e-1715
chordal neural plate4.34e-1715
basal ganglion5.35e-179
nuclear complex of neuraxis5.35e-179
aggregate regional part of brain5.35e-179
collection of basal ganglia5.35e-179
cerebral subcortex5.35e-179
neural nucleus5.98e-179
nucleus of brain5.98e-179
tube3.23e-16192
organ part3.70e-15218
anatomical cluster4.14e-14373
anatomical conduit1.15e-13240
telencephalic nucleus2.92e-137
temporal lobe5.44e-136
multi-tissue structure1.34e-12342
brainstem2.59e-126
segmental subdivision of hindbrain3.14e-1212
hindbrain3.14e-1212
presumptive hindbrain3.14e-1212
gyrus2.21e-116
segmental subdivision of nervous system4.06e-1113
epithelium4.44e-11306
cell layer8.42e-11309
limbic system1.34e-105
occipital lobe1.25e-095
parietal lobe1.80e-095
regional part of diencephalon2.34e-084
corpus striatum9.38e-084
striatum9.38e-084
ventral part of telencephalon9.38e-084
future corpus striatum9.38e-084
organ1.19e-07503
regional part of metencephalon1.65e-079
metencephalon1.65e-079
future metencephalon1.65e-079
diencephalon4.25e-077
future diencephalon4.25e-077
pons5.31e-073
medulla oblongata5.85e-073
myelencephalon5.85e-073
future myelencephalon5.85e-073
spinal cord7.81e-073
dorsal region element7.81e-073
dorsum7.81e-073
embryo9.47e-07592


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.233555
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.12.53613
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.11.52107
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.214613
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.12.00595
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.11.70272
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.483275
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.21.09513
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.122011
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.