Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4776

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:19, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4776_Endothelial_Dendritic_CD4_acute_Renal_Hepatic_CD8



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:8204806..8204818,-p@chr8:8204806..8204818
-
Hg19::chr8:8204819..8204835,-p@chr8:8204819..8204835
-
Hg19::chr8:8204841..8204858,-p@chr8:8204841..8204858
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endothelial cell1.43e-2436
endothelial cell of vascular tree1.02e-2024
hematopoietic stem cell5.88e-18168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell5.88e-18168
meso-epithelial cell1.06e-1645
blood vessel endothelial cell2.65e-1618
embryonic blood vessel endothelial progenitor cell2.65e-1618
hematopoietic cell1.61e-15177
nongranular leukocyte2.07e-15115
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell6.04e-15161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell6.04e-15161
leukocyte6.17e-15136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.58e-14120
lining cell5.08e-1058
barrier cell5.08e-1058
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.32e-0966
myeloid cell5.76e-09108
common myeloid progenitor5.76e-09108
endothelial cell of artery5.82e-099
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell6.90e-0967
monopoietic cell1.89e-0859
monocyte1.89e-0859
monoblast1.89e-0859
promonocyte1.89e-0859
mature alpha-beta T cell2.15e-0818
alpha-beta T cell2.15e-0818
immature T cell2.15e-0818
mature T cell2.15e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell2.15e-0818
myeloid leukocyte6.95e-0872
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.00e-0861
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism5.21e-21114
hemolymphoid system4.98e-18108
blood vessel endothelium2.65e-1618
endothelium2.65e-1618
cardiovascular system endothelium2.65e-1618
lateral plate mesoderm4.30e-15203
hematopoietic system1.96e-1498
blood island1.96e-1498
immune system7.14e-1393
simple squamous epithelium6.54e-1222
neural tube1.21e-0956
neural rod1.21e-0956
future spinal cord1.21e-0956
neural keel1.21e-0956
squamous epithelium1.33e-0925
cardiovascular system4.37e-09109
endothelial tube5.82e-099
arterial system endothelium5.82e-099
endothelium of artery5.82e-099
circulatory system2.09e-08112
regional part of nervous system2.25e-0853
regional part of brain2.25e-0853
vessel5.88e-0868
bone marrow2.54e-0776
blood4.15e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid4.15e-0715
organism substance4.15e-0715
regional part of forebrain5.15e-0741
forebrain5.15e-0741
anterior neural tube5.15e-0741
future forebrain5.15e-0741
telencephalon9.52e-0734
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
hematologic cancer5.17e-0751
immune system cancer5.17e-0751


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0471418
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.11.88666
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.886807
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.11.70054
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.846801
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.11.3784
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.12.18164
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.11.31729
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.21.9924
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.0526989
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.21.60005
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.11.51687
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.12.7096
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.21.55139
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.00160703
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00919531554798136
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109468879303488
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00632332774024262



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.